Lebanon, once thought of as among the most liberal parts of the Middle East, is poised to ban global hit movie “Barbie.” More conservative Kuwait said Wednesday that it had gone ahead with a ban du…

Different country, different culture. Anyhow, the movie is actually somewhat superficial, I understand.

  • rjs001@lemmygrad.ml
    19·
    11 months ago

    If it teaches worship of western ideals then you should not be be allowed to

    • Dr Cog@mander.xyz
      22·
      11 months ago

      Isn’t that a bit fascist? People should be able to watch what they want to watch

      • rjs001@lemmygrad.ml
        24·
        11 months ago

        That’s not what fascism is. We ban things as a society that are harmful for us. I’m sure libertarians disagree with that basic principal but pretty much everyone else doesnt

      • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
        15·
        11 months ago

        I don’t think you know what “fascist” means.

        Moreover, people will happily complain that Chinese/Russian “propaganda” is allowed to exist, especially on the internet. They will demand that Chinese/Russian “propaganda” is removed from social spaces. And, then they somehow they have a problem with other countries (esp. China/Russia) wanting to do the exact same thing. The premise is that the propaganda being put out is misrepresenting the truth to influence public thought: when it comes from China/Russia, people want it blocked and removed; when it comes from the West, blocking and removing it is some sort of “free speech” issue (or, as you wrongly claim here, “fascism”).

        In this particular case, I don’t personally know hardly anything about the movie, and I do strongly disagree with using “promoting homosexuality” as an excuse to ban something. But in general, countries wanting to put a damper on other countries’ propaganda is near universal.