Different country, different culture. Anyhow, the movie is actually somewhat superficial, I understand.

  • rjs001@lemmygrad.ml
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    11 months ago

    Bad reason to bad but it’s preferable if countries start banning awful, vile western spewings

      • rjs001@lemmygrad.ml
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        If it teaches worship of western ideals then you should not be be allowed to

        • Dr Cog@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Isn’t that a bit fascist? People should be able to watch what they want to watch

          • rjs001@lemmygrad.ml
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            That’s not what fascism is. We ban things as a society that are harmful for us. I’m sure libertarians disagree with that basic principal but pretty much everyone else doesnt

          • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I don’t think you know what “fascist” means.

            Moreover, people will happily complain that Chinese/Russian “propaganda” is allowed to exist, especially on the internet. They will demand that Chinese/Russian “propaganda” is removed from social spaces. And, then they somehow they have a problem with other countries (esp. China/Russia) wanting to do the exact same thing. The premise is that the propaganda being put out is misrepresenting the truth to influence public thought: when it comes from China/Russia, people want it blocked and removed; when it comes from the West, blocking and removing it is some sort of “free speech” issue (or, as you wrongly claim here, “fascism”).

            In this particular case, I don’t personally know hardly anything about the movie, and I do strongly disagree with using “promoting homosexuality” as an excuse to ban something. But in general, countries wanting to put a damper on other countries’ propaganda is near universal.