• FergleFFergleson
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    It could take a century

    Maybe we should chip in and buy a second robot.

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          6 days ago

          The union would be extremely powerful with just one robot though. There would be no competition or different opinions. If the single robot strikes to get better working conditions or better pay, the entire workforce is on strike.

          • sbv@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            6 days ago

            yes yes, but the robot cannot strike, you see, because one robot must make the strike motion, another robot must second the strike motion, and then all the robots must vote. if there is no robot to second the strike motion, then no robots may vote, meaning the strike cannot pass.

            • flicker@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              6 days ago

              I would like to add to this conversation, “I’ve talked it over with myself and I’ve decided I’m going on strike,” is an extremely powerful thing to say.

              …I didn’t promise my addition would be valuable.

    • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 days ago

      It may take a century not because of robot costs, but because the materials haven’t decayed enough to store in a dry cask.