• @rob64@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    3111 months ago

    And whenever you have a chart of historical data like this, you have to at least consider that an increase could be reflective of either improved diagnostic or record-keeping abilities.

      • @Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        1111 months ago

        More like you just died from old in 1970, versus acute heat stroke in 2023.

        I say this being fully on board with the climate change. Charts like this serve little purpose when you don’t properly adjust for the myriad changes that have occured over the last half century. And before anyone says “you mean like global warming,” no, don’t account for that one, because that’s what we’re trying to see.

        • DrNeurohax
          link
          fedilink
          311 months ago

          Yeah, it can be as simple as the death certificates requiring only a primary cause of death.

          Old man collapses from a heart attack while trying to change a tire on a hot desert road? Cause of death: heart attack. If more details are requested, they could probably get away with just claiming age-related health issues. The guy is dead, no foul play, the case is closed.

        • DrNeurohax
          link
          fedilink
          211 months ago

          The libs are making us slaves to those damn thermomasters! They better not take away my freedom to boil off those 3 remaining brain cells!

    • DrNeurohax
      link
      fedilink
      211 months ago

      Very much this, and especially over this period. More universal diagnostics, more emphasis on secondary causes and contributors, etc.

      And it works the other way, too. Fewer people should die per capita based on faster EMS response times, better medicine, more urban living, etc.

      The big one for me is age. I never really heard of people retiring to Arizona until the late 90s. It was always Florida before then. The over 50 crowd is 36% now vs 23% in 1970.