FenrirIII@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 1 month agoExploited ruleslrpnk.netimagemessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1878arrow-down114file-textcross-posted to: 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
arrow-up1864arrow-down1imageExploited ruleslrpnk.netFenrirIII@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square45fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
minus-square𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23arrow-down2·1 month agoTo make their line go up, they must make your line go down.
minus-squareiknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoNot necessarily. Increases in productivity could have been split between labor and capital, giving benefits to both. (Or even better, gone just to labor, but that would not be a “both lines go up” scenario.)
minus-square𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 month agoYes. I was referring to how capitalism tended to have worked in the past decade or so, and not to how to actually make the line go up. E: autocorrect
To make their line go up, they must make your line go down.
Not necessarily.
Increases in productivity could have been split between labor and capital, giving benefits to both. (Or even better, gone just to labor, but that would not be a “both lines go up” scenario.)
Yes. I was referring to how capitalism tended to have worked in the past decade or so, and not to how to actually make the line go up.
E: autocorrect