• henfredemars
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Precisely. Flatpaks solve an important problem. Perfect should not be the enemy of good.

    Binary compatibility is a sad story on Linux, and we cannot expect developers — many of whom work for free — to package, test, debug, and maintain releases for multiple distributions. If we want a sustainable ecosystem with diverse distributions, we must answer the compatibility question. This is a working option that solves the problem, and it comes with minor security benefits because it isolates applications not just from the system but from each other.

    It’s fair to criticize a solution, but I think it’s not fair to ignore the problem and expect volunteers to just work harder.

    • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      3 days ago

      Also companies are lazy and if we don’t want to be stuck on Ubuntu for proprietary app stability. We should probably embrace something like flatpak. Also when companies neglect their apps, it’ll have a better chance of working down the road thanks to support for multiple dependency versions on the same install.

      • henfredemars
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        Great point! At the end of the day, the apps I want to use will decide which distro I main. Many FOSS fanatics are quick to critique Ubuntu, So they should support solutions that allow our distro to be diverse and use all the killer apps.