• viking
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Oh it did give a longer response initially, then I asked to reduce the sentence to its essence, just like the ad from this post did. The longer version was:

    A woman occasionally prepares a meal for a man, including a variety of foods and drinks, potentially exotic or unusual. Despite her efforts and the variety she provides, the man often dismisses the meals disdainfully. Even when she’s struggling physically (with shaking joints), she keeps trying to please him with her cooking. But no matter how hard she tries, he often rejects her efforts, treating her with scorn. Despite his harsh treatment, the woman remains safe.

    • debil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Interesting. I’d definitely skim through such a version, albeit it totally abolishes the intricacies of FW.

      • viking
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yep, but it opens it up to a broader audience. Even though that’s probably exactly the opposite of what he intended.

        • debil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Many parts of FW work a bit like an abstract painting where each viewer finds their own interpretation, each of those equally valid and independent of what the author possibly intended. An AI dumbed down version would just show one path through the work, the one it thinks is the main road. But yes, at best, such version could sparkle an interest and function as a gateway to the work. Or extinguish all interest for good.