• noevidenz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    The LNP doesn’t have a legitimate interest in transitioning to nuclear power or they would’ve begun over the last decade or so that they were in power.

    Instead they’ve proposed - now that they’re in opposition - a technology which is banned at the Federal level and individually at the state level, because they know that gives them years of lead time before they ever have to begin the project.

    On top of that, all of the proposed sites are owned by companies who’ve already begun transitioning to renewable generation or renewable storage, and most of them are in states in which the state Premiers have publicly stated that they will not consider overturning their bans on nuclear power.

    • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      All this talk about nuclear only does one thing, keeping fossil fuels relevant for longer.

      • noevidenz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        Exactly. They’ve brought up nuclear because they’re desperate to have some kind of energy policy, but one they know they’ll never have to bring to fruition because that allows them to continue with coal and gas for as long as possible.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        I tend to agree. The right time to build nuclear was like 30 years ago.

        The same people who opposed it then are the same people saying it’s the future now. If anybody agrees to build it, the you’ll have 15-20 years of renewable energy being cancelled because the “nuclear is on the way”.